Porsche SE is Undervalued – Volkswagen Stock Analysis

In the last few weeks I have received probably more than 5 tips from various sources to look into Porsche SE, because it is extremely undervalued and there is a lot of potential for the stock over the next few years. I’ve read a few hundred pages of reports and this article summarizes my conclusion.

Content:

Porsche SE ownership of Volkswagen and holding discount

Volkswagen stock analysis

Undervaluation – relative and absolute

Personal opinion and conclusion

What is the deal?

Porsche SE

Porsche SE (PAH3) is a company holding Porsche’s family stake into Volkswagen (VOW3). In 2007, Porsche tried to take over VOW, the didn’t make it and VOW took them over. As part of the deal the Porsche family got shares in VOW. The following is the holding structure:

1 porsche

Source: Porsche

It is important to note that the Porsche-Piëch family has all of the voting shares so you can only buy preference shares. (Also traded as ADRs on NYSE)

VOW3 – 501 million shares – 19 February 2019 price is €141.6 for a market cap. of €71 billion.

PAH3 – 306 million shares – 19 February 2019 price is €54.62 for a market cap of €16.7 billion.

PAH3 owns 30.8% of the subscribed capital of VOW3, thus €21.8 billion.

The discount is sometimes bigger and sometimes smaller as the stocks don’t trade in sync.

2 comparison

Source: Bloomberg

In any case, buying PAH gives you a 24% discount on VOW at the moment. The key is to look at whether VOW is worth buying in the long term and one can always debate about the holding discounts.

VOW stock analysis

VOW, like any other car company is a cyclical and you have to put it into that bin or folder. Cyclicals do very well when the economy is doing good and terribly when the economy is slowing down as companies buy less cars etc. However, you can only postpone a purchase for a year or two, sometimes a bit longer, but then buyers usually rush back to replacing their old cars with new ones.

Can we predict the cycle? Impossible to do accurately, especially with all the central bank interventions. So, what I prefer doing is simply estimate a recession every 5 years, see how an average one would hit the company, see how the company is doing when things are fine, like those have been in 2018, and get to average earnings that we can use to calculate intrinsic value.

In my book, Modern Value Investing, I analysed Daimler as an example, when writing the stock price was €70, my fair value was closer to €40 and fortunately for my book sales, the stock is closing in on the second price.

3 daimpler

Source: Bloomberg

As there are fears of a recession, the stock falls, when the sentiment is more upbeat, the stock is up. Therefore, one has to buy these stocks when there is blood on the streets. However, before buying, one must know what would be a good business price to pay for a decent long-term business/earnings return. Let’s see.

VOW group hopes to increase their return on sales by 1.5 percentage points by 2025. Given sales are €230 billion, it would not be a bad thing.

4 return on sales

Source: VOW

But, just to stay conservative, let’s say they don’t improve there. On the cash flow, they have their benchmark at €10 billion, a level they can achieve and have been achieving.

5 cash flow

Source: VOW

So, in a bad year, cash flows will probably be €0 to €3 billion, in a good year it will be €10 to €12 billion and 8 billion in an average year. In a cycle, we will have two good years, two so-so and one bad. I would say their net cash flows should be around €8 billion per year over the next 5 to 10 years.

The industry is highly competitive so, this is what one should expect. €8 billion on a €70 billion market cap implies a yield of 11%, not bad. I have to see what is the story around the €8 billion in cash flows. In the 5 year strategy plan conference webcast, the finance board member discusses how they expect to reach the 30% earnings dividend pay-out in 2020 and keep that for longer.

6 earnings

Source: VOW

So, 30% of €25 is €8.3 that on a €141 stock price, would imply a dividend of 5.8%. The positive scenario would imply a €10 dividend that is still just 7% of it.

The 7% dividend yield from VOW would be a 9.1% dividend from Porsche. So, this doesn’t come even close to my required 15% return but I’ll give you another perspective.

The market’s perspective on VOW

Remember all the brands VOW has?

7 brands

Audi (NSU) is traded on a stock exchange with a market cap of €33 billion and VOW owns 99.64%.

VOW also plans to IPO Traton, the truck/transportation division, in April for €6 billion for 25% that would value the company at €24 billion. Let’s say €20 billion. Just Audi and Traton are already at a €53 billion value.

8 traton

Source: Traton

Then we have the car branks and makers; Volkswagen, Skoda and Seat, that should also be worth at least €30, €5 and €5 billion respectively. Thus, we are at €93 billion in total. And, not to forget, Porsche AG, the car maker, not the holding company.

Ferrari N.V. that spun out of Fiat Chrysler a few years back, has operating cash flows of €400 million and a market capitalization of €20 billion.

9 ferrrari

Source: Ferrari

In 2018, Porsche AG had operating cash flows of €4 billion that would leave at least €2 billion in cash flows. Give it a Ferrari valuation and you are at €100 billion, but let’s put is at just €25 billion.

There is then the financial services, another €2.5 billion in operating cash flows that we can set a value of €10 billion on.

Lamborgini, Bugatti, Bentley etc must be worth something too. When I sum things up, I get to €128 billion. That could easily happen as it is all a valuation game. The current PE ratio is 5, bring it up to 10 and the market cap would quickly be €140 billion.

Personal opinion and conclusion

I see where the undervalued perspective comes from, but that is relative value investing and not absolute value investing focused on earnings. There are large liabilities on VOW’s balance sheet, high forward expected investments, where €44 billion will be invested in the EV trend, which make me stick to my yield expectation, where I would love at least an 15% yield, which means VOW, or PAH have to decline at least 50% for me to take a serious interest. Well, perhaps in the next recession, if not we have other vegetables to fry.

Receive a weekly overview of published articles, videos and research reports straight to your inbox for boring long-term investing knowledge!

 

 

 

 

Cie Financiere Richemont and LVMH Stock Analysis

Before starting with the analysis of LVMH and Richemont (CFR), I am going to say that there is a lot of money in the world. When luxury brands more than double, or even triple their sales over the last 10 years, like Richemont and LVMH did respectively, it means the rich are getting richer. So, will the rich get richer also in the future? If yes, then LVMH and Richemont should be great investments.

Content

Company overviews

Company fundamentals

Investment bank analysts’ reports and targets for Richemont

My investing views

Global wealth growth – a strong tailwind

Investing strategy

Company overviews

LVMH is a bigger company, more diversified and therefore some suspect more stable in case of a recession, but more about the risks part later, you will be surprised about the business impact of a recession on these businesses. LVMH’s net income in 2009 compared to 2008, dropped only 20%, but that impacts the stock as analysts always project the current into the future as we will see later.

pastedGraphic.png

Source: LVMH

Apart from fashion, the second contributor to revenue is selective retailing. Le Grande Epicerie de Paris is a food hall, DFS is a global luxury travel retailer and Sephora mostly a cosmetics brand. 

pastedGraphic_1.png

Source: LVMH

While selective retailing and fashion goods make 68% of LVMH’s sales, 73% of Richemont’s sales come from watches and jewellery.

pastedGraphic_2.png

Source: Richemont Investor Relations

The company recently completely acquired Yoox Net-a-porter for (YNAP) for a consideration of €2.7 billion and a valuation €5.3 billion as they were already the largest shareholder.

Richemont is mostly famous for its jewellery brand Cartier and the watches.

pastedGraphic_3.png

Source: Richemont business

Company fundamentals

On the surface, there isn’t a big difference between the two. LVMH has a PE ratio of 24 and a dividend yield of 1.83%.

pastedGraphic_4.png

Source: Morningstar – LVMH

Richemont has a PE ratio of 12.78 but that is mostly due to a one off non-cash tax gain, so the forward PE is close to LVMH’s but the dividend is much higher.

pastedGraphic_5.png

Source: Morningstar – RITN

The difference in dividend yields can be explained by the Swiss withholding tax of 35%. In any case, before buying, ask your broker about tax issues and check the agreement your country has with Switzerland.pastedGraphic_6.png

Source: Richemont

The valuations are similar after the dividend tax. 

The price to sales ratios are also similar, with 2.84 for RITN and 3.33 for LVMH. Sales growth is 10% for LVMH, 24% for RITN, but 8% excluding the acquired online retailer. 

What is different is the stock price performance. LVMH’s stock went only up over the past 10 years.

pastedGraphic_7.png

Source: Morningstar LVMH stock price

While RITN’s stock price is back to 2012 levels.

pastedGraphic_8.png

Source: Google CFR stock price

Apart from the stock price, the balance sheets look different too.

pastedGraphic_9.png

Source: Richemont

Richemont has €10.6 billion of cash and liquid assets (1), countering €4.4 billion in long term debt (2) and €4.4 billion in bank overdrafts (3). But those can be covered by the inventory of €6 billion. The company is actually sitting on €10.6 billion in cash that doesn’t really have to be used, plus the debt to equity is 0.54. If I calculate things correctly, the liquid assets only are worth €18 per share.

On the other hand, LVMH has also €4.6 billion in cash (1), but more debt going up to €23 billion (2), plus, most of the assets are goodwill and brand or intangible assets (3). So, let’s say the balance sheet doesn’t look as good, plus, there is much less available liquidity per share.